Few passages in Scripture have sparked more debate than John 6, where Jesus declares that His followers must eat His flesh and drink His blood to have eternal life. Many modern readers say He spoke symbolically. But when we look closely—at the context, His own words, and how those taught by the Apostles understood them—it becomes clear that Jesus meant exactly what He said.
Setting the Scene: From Loaves to Life
John 6:31–59 records what’s often called the Bread of Life Discourse, a pivotal moment in the Gospel. The setting is Capernaum, shortly after the miracle of the loaves and fishes. The crowd, still amazed, seeks another sign. “Our fathers ate the manna in the desert,” they remind Him (v. 31), hoping for more free bread.
But Jesus redirects them. He tells them not to work for perishable food, but for the food that endures to eternal life (v. 27). St. Augustine noted that the crowd “stopped in the mere excitement of being satiated.” They wanted full stomachs, not transformed souls.
Jesus begins to reveal something greater: “It was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven; my Father gives you the true bread from heaven” (v. 32). Here, the conversation shifts from earthly to divine, from manna to Himself.
“I Am the Bread of Life”
When Jesus says, “I am the bread of life” (v. 35), He’s not offering poetry; He’s making a radical claim about His identity. Those who come to Him “shall not hunger,” He says—not because they’ll never eat again, but because they’ll find in Him the fulfillment of every spiritual hunger.
In these first verses, Jesus uses symbolic language—coming, believing, receiving—to describe faith. But then, the tone changes. The metaphor gives way to a concrete reality.
“The Bread That I Will Give Is My Flesh”
The turning point arrives in verse 51:
“The bread that I will give is my flesh, for the life of the world.”
The crowd immediately grasps how shocking this sounds. “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” (v. 52). If Jesus were only speaking figuratively, this would have been the perfect time to clarify. Instead, He intensifies His words:
“Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you.
Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.” (vv. 53–54)
The Greek verb used here, trogo, means “to gnaw” or “to chew”—a deliberately earthy word that drives home physical reality. Six times in these verses Jesus repeats the command to eat His flesh and drink His blood. The repetition is intentional. He’s not speaking symbolically; He’s driving home a literal truth.
And the reaction? Many disciples murmur that this saying is “hard” (v. 60). So hard, in fact, that “many of His disciples drew back and no longer walked with Him” (v. 66). If Jesus only meant “believe in Me,” why would they leave? Belief was nothing new. They walked away because they understood Him literally—and He let them go.
The Early Church Understood It Literally
The Christians who lived closest to the time of the Apostles had no doubt about what Jesus meant.
- St. Ignatius of Antioch (A.D. 107) called the Eucharist “the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ.”
- St. Justin Martyr wrote around A.D. 155 that the food we call the Eucharist “is not common bread or common drink; but… the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh.”
- St. Irenaeus, disciple of Polycarp (who was taught by St. John himself), said that the Eucharist “is no longer common bread but the Eucharist, consisting of two realities, earthly and heavenly.”
These witnesses show the belief wasn’t invented later; it was there from the beginning. The Church simply preserved what she received.
Faith vs. Fleshly Thinking
Some point to verse 63—“It is the Spirit that gives life; the flesh profits nothing”—as proof Jesus was speaking metaphorically. But that interpretation doesn’t fit the context. Jesus isn’t dismissing His own flesh; after all, His flesh is what He gives “for the life of the world.”
He’s contrasting spiritual understanding with carnal thinking—the same misunderstanding that caused the crowd to stumble. The Spirit reveals divine mysteries that human reasoning alone cannot grasp. As Augustine explained, “The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life—not because they are allegorical, but because they are to be understood spiritually.”
Faith, then, is the key. When many turned away, Peter stayed—not because he understood, but because he trusted:
“Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.” (v. 68)
Why the Symbolic View Falls Short
The “symbolic only” reading of John 6 collapses under its own weight. Symbols don’t cause scandal, and metaphors don’t drive disciples away. Jesus used figures of speech often—and when people misunderstood, He clarified (as with Nicodemus and being “born again,” or the woman at the well and “living water”). But here, He doesn’t explain; He reinforces.
Even the grammar of the text refuses symbolism. “My flesh is true food and my blood is true drink” (v. 55). The Greek word alethes means real, genuine—not metaphorical. If He meant “represents,” He chose the wrong word.
The crowd’s shock, the disciples’ departure, the apostles’ steadfast faith, and the early Church’s unanimous belief all point to the same conclusion: Jesus meant what He said.
From the Upper Room to the Altar
John 6 finds its fulfillment at the Last Supper: “This is My Body… This is My Blood” (Luke 22:19–20). The words of institution are not a change of topic but the completion of the promise made in Capernaum.
When the priest consecrates the bread and wine at Mass, Catholics believe—just as the first Christians did—that they become the Body and Blood of Christ. The outward appearances remain, but the substance changes. This mystery, called transubstantiation, is the Church’s way of describing what Jesus declared long ago: the bread is no longer mere bread; it is Him.
A Promise That Endures
In John 6, Jesus offers Himself as the living bread come down from heaven. The manna sustained Israel for a day; the Eucharist sustains the Church for eternity. Through every age and culture, the same Jesus invites us to partake of His divine life.
When we approach the altar, we echo Peter’s faith-filled confession: “Lord, to whom shall we go?” The Eucharist is not a symbol of Christ—it is Christ, the Bread of Life, given so that we “may have life, and have it abundantly.”
Further Reading
This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through these links, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.